Government News Center
prepared by

"Hot Issues"
YOU HAVE A PRESENCE IN WASHINGTON DC!
Check the "pulse" in Washington and visit our Washington, DC Update  to read the latest on ASHT's involvement in our nation's capitol.

Therapy Cap

Washington Update: February 16, 2006
CMS Announces Therapy Cap Exception Procedures

Exceptions Process
CMS has established an exceptions process for the therapy caps that is effective retroactively to January 1, 2006. Providers, whose claims have already been denied because of the caps, should contact their carrier to request that the claim be reopened and reviewed to determine if the beneficiary would have qualified for the exception. In addition, providers who have not yet submitted claims for services on or after January 1, 2006 that qualify for the exception, should submit these claims for payment, and refund to the beneficiary any private payments collected because of the cap.

The exceptions process allows for two types of exceptions to caps for medically necessary services:

Automatic Exceptions: Automatic exceptions for certain conditions or complexities are allowed without a written request. A request to the contractor for an exception is not required when services related to these conditions and complexities are appropriately provided and documented. We anticipate that the majority of beneficiaries who require services in excess of the caps will qualify for automatic exceptions.

Manual Exceptions: Manual exceptions require submission of a written request by the beneficiary or provider and medical review by the contractor responsible for processing the claims. If the patient does not have a condition or complexity that allows automatic exception, but is believed to require medically necessary services exceeding the caps--the provider/supplier or beneficiary may fax a letter requesting up to 15 treatment days of service beyond the cap. A treatment day is a day on which one or more services are provided. The request must include certain documentation, including a justification for the request. Contractors will make a decision on the number of treatment days they determine are medically necessary within 10 business days. These requests for cap exceptions should be submitted prior to the date the cap is expected to be surpassed to avoid placing the beneficiary at risk of incurring the costs of treatment if the request is denied.

As with any new CMS claim process we will be working through the system to ensure that this is easy to use for both the patient and the practitioner.

For more information regarding automatic and manual exceptions, please refer to the CMS fact sheet which can be found here: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1782


On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed the “Deficit Reduction Act of 2005” into law, stating that “the Act reduces unnecessary spending of taxpayer dollars,” and reflects “a commitment to fiscal responsibility.” As you probably remember, the Senate approved the FY 2006 Budget Reconciliation Conference Report in December before winter recess. The House, however, was forced to vote again on the bill after the Senate made minor changes to the language. The House finally passed the FY 2006 Budget Reconciliation on February 1, with a 216 to 214 vote, largely along party lines.

The bill contains a legislative victory for the therapy community, as provisions implement a program that allows exceptions to the outpatient therapy cap for 2006. The bill:

  • Creates a process (by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) in which beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare may request an exemption from the $1,740 (approximate) dollar limitation for outpatient therapy services.
    • Services deemed medically necessary will be reimbursed.
    • The approval is passive. If the Secretary does not respond that the service is not medically necessary within 10 business days of receiving the request, the care can be provided.
  • Implements clinically appropriate code edits to identify and eliminate improper payments for therapy services.

Shortly after the President signed the “Deficit Reduction Act” into law, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) released a fact sheet establishing the therapy cap exception process. This process can be viewed on the CMS website here: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1782

While this outcome is a victory for the therapy community, a permanent fix will still be needed in 2007. Fortunately, two members of Congress, one member of the House and one from the Senate, have taken up the call to permanently fix the therapy cap. Last year, both H.R. 1125, introduced by Representative English (R-PA) and S.1024, introduced by Senator Ensign (R-NV), sought to repeal the Medicare caps on outpatient rehabilitation therapy. This year Representative English and Senator Ensign have reintroduced this legislation as H.R. 916 and S.438 with the same goal in mind. Although the Budget Reconciliation has postponed the $1,740 cap, a permanent fix remains a priority for ASHT.

ASHT's Position:   Support the legislation and repeal the cap.

For more information about H.R. 916 and S.438 please CLICK HERE.


Washington Update: February 2, 2006
Reconciliation Bill Passes by Slim Margin

The House, on February 1, passed the FY 2006 Budget Reconciliation bill with a 216 to 214 vote, largely along party lines. This was the second time the House has voted on this bill, as the Senate made minor changes to the language which forced the House to take up the legislation again. The bill now goes to the President’s desk to be signed into law, which is essentially guaranteed.

As you may remember, the FY 2006 Budget Reconciliation contains a legislative victory for the therapy community, as provisions implement a program that fixes the outpatient therapy cap for 2006. The Budget Reconciliation’s one-year therapy cap fix includes several important provisions. First, the legislation allows those patients who reach the $1,760 cap on therapy services to request for additional services. In the appeals process, a patient, or someone on behalf of the patient, must appeal to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for additional medically necessary services. In the event that the Secretary does not respond in 10 business days, it may be assumed that the Secretary has approved of the request to exceed the $1,760 cap on therapy services. In addition to this short-term fix, the Reconciliation calls on Medicare to establish clinically appropriate code edits to identify and eliminate improper payments for therapy services.

The ASHT government relations team will update you as more information becomes available and will alert you when the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has established the procedure for exemption from the therapy cap. We are currently in contact with CMS to ensure the process will be the least disruptive for your patients and your practice. We will also post an update to the ASHT Web site.

Direct Access

Last year, H.R. 792 and S. 493, the "Medicare Patient Access to Physical Therapists Act of 2003," were aimed at amending Medicare in order to authorize qualified physical therapists to provide services for Medicare beneficiaries without the requirement of a "primary care" physician referral. Both pieces of legislation, however, preserve the existing law that requires Medicare beneficiaries to obtain a physician referral before seeking the care of an occupational therapist. This legislation has been reintroduced in the House of Representatives by Representative Hart (R-PA) as H.R. 1333 and in the Senate by Senator Lincoln (D-AR) as S. 647.

ASHT's Position
:   No formal position, although currently ASHT is carefully considering its stance on this issue.

For more information about H.R. 1333 and S. 647 please CLICK HERE.

Competitive Bidding on Durable Medical Equipment (DME)

Section 302 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, authorizes the Secretary to utilize a competitive acquisition authority, and requires Medicare to replace the current DME payment methodology for certain items with a competitive acquisition process. This new bidding process will establish payment amounts for certain DME, enteral nutrition, and off the shelf orthotics. Additionally, CMS will implement a competitive bidding program in July 2006 to allow Medicare providers to purchase certain drugs at market prices. In 2007, CMS will expand the use of competitive bidding to the purchase of durable medical equipment (DME) and supplies.

Under this new DME model, CMS will use competitive bidding in selected markets. The MMA requires that competition occur in ten of the largest metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) starting in 2007, expanding to 80 of the largest MSAs by 2009. CMS will choose the 10 regions they believe will provide the most competitive environment and will be of a size that will not overwhelm their current capacity to conduct a bidding process. Under a previous DME demonstration project, competitive bidding achieved Medicare savings and this expanded program is expected to produce similar results.

Although Representative Hobson (R-OH) and Representative McCarthy (D-NY) introduced legislation in 2004 that would repeal the reduction in Medicare payment for certain items of DME, there has been no new legislation introduced in the 109th Congress.

ASHT's Position:   Oppose the CMS regulation which allows less qualified individuals to provide DME to patients, and which may cause delay in treatments due to the necessity of a bidding process. Support legislation to repeal the reduction in Medicare reimbursement for DME.

HCPCS: Code Revision/Reimbursement

HCPCS is divided into two subsystems:   Level I and Level II

Level I:   CPT-4, a numeric coding system maintained by the AMA to identify medical services and procedures furnished by physicians and other healthcare professionals.

Level II:   Standardized coding system that is used primarily to identify products, supplies, and services not included in the CPT-4 Codes.

There have been no new HCPCS legislation/regulations introduced this year.

ASHT's Position:   Level II "L" codes should be revised.

30 Day Rule

The 30 day rule requires that patients visit their physician every thirty days to continue treatment and therapy.

There has been no new legislation/regulations regarding the 30 day rule introduced this year.

ASHT's Position:   The 30 day rule is a barrier to effective and consistent treatment and it should be eliminated.

If you have any questions or would like any additional information about the ASHT Government News Center, please contact ASHT GR Representatives at 202.367.1175 or email ecarpenter@smithbucklin.com